This site uses cookies to provide you with a great user experience. By using BondbloX, you accept our use of cookies.
With CapBridge’s fully digital investment platform, it’s fast and easy to get started.
For a limited time, investors get to enjoy up to 50% rebate off annual fees. Now, enjoy an even lower cost of bond ownership.
India Cleantech Energy/Acme Solar $ amortising 5NC3 green bond at 5% area
Chengdu Xingjin Construction Development and Investment Group $ 3Y final at 3.7%
ESR REIT raised S$125mn via a 5Y bond at a yield of 2.6%, 15bp inside initial guidance of 2.75%. The bonds are unrated. The issuer is RBC Investor Services Trust Singapore, in its capacity as the REIT’s trustee. Proceeds will be used for debt refinancing, financing or refinancing of acquisitions and investments, funding development and asset enhancement works, as well as supporting working capital needs and capital expenditure. This is the REIT’s first issuance since it priced an S$150mn 4.6% PerpNC5 in 2017.
Gemdale Corp hires for $ green bonds
Chindata Group hires for $ green bonds; calls today
Chongqing International Logistics Hub Park Construction hires for $ bonds; calls today
In case you missed it – China’s real estate developers’ high yield Index underperformed its peers witnessing a sharp drop of 6% in June and down 3.7% YTD. Investor concerns were apparent since the start of Q2 with Z-Spreads widening across certain Chinese real estate developers. China Evergrande’s Z-Spread widened by a massive 1,800bp since April, the highest in the sector as investor concerns grow over its liquidity position. The ‘three red-lines’ (Term of the Day, explained below), a key regulatory threshold for property developers set by Beijing has become an important factor that separates the winners and the losers.
In this editorial piece, we detail the widening Z-Spreads across companies in the Chinese property sector, the sector’s underperformance, and the three red-lines calculations of the key players.
Hawkish is a term used to describe a monetary policy stance where policymakers are concerned about inflation or overheating risks and therefore adopt a tightening stance. A hawkish stance could be either in the form of rate increases, asset purchases decreases or even indications on the same relative to market expectations. This is the opposite of a dovish stance, where the monetary policy stance is more accommodative in nature. In yesterday’s FOMC meeting, analysts expected a slight hawkish tilt to the central bank decision regarding a timeline or greater details on planned asset purchase decreases. But, Chairman Powell did not signal any of that and rather indicated that there was still time to decide on that.